Daily Archives: September 25, 2014

Nuclear Option?

9 25 14 Folks,
War or the pretext of war notwithstanding, we must not be distracted from resisting the fundamental change the nation is undergoing. The war effort will not slow the transformation; if anything it will accelerate the process. We must remain dedicated to the cause of reversing the changes, or as a last resort start fresh by seceding from this union in an organized well planned movement.
An America where government representatives, local or higher, decide who, where and when we can fly the American flag, whether or not our children can recite the Pledge of Allegiance, where we can pray, how to display and when not to display religious icons, on and on, is not the land of liberty our forefathers fought and died for.
Over three years ago I suggested to Congressman Allen West and others that we prepare for this exigency and was told it could never happen and given a litany of reasons. Today the idea is not so far-fetched. The important thing is to maintain a Constitutional Republic on this continent and avoid unnecessary loss of life in the process. Will it be an all out revolution or a soft revolution? Many now believe one or the other is inevitable unless Barack is removed and a determined, powerful administration, determined to restore this nation at all costs, takes the initiative. We must vote with that in mind and equally as important we must see to it that the process is not corrupt.
A nation where the order of authority is from the people down is our God given birth right. It is not reversed as Barack Obama told us. It is being reversed by edict and outright defiance of the Constitution. We the people have the only legitimate authority to take the country back.
Please read on.
Secession: No Longer a Nutty Idea
Posted on September 20, 2014
The failed Scottish vote to pull out from the United Kingdom stirred secessionist hopes for some in the United States, where almost a quarter of people are open to their states leaving the union, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found.
Some 23.9 percent of Americans polled from Aug. 23 through Sept. 16 said they strongly supported or tended to support the idea of their state breaking away, while 53.3 percent of the 8,952 respondents strongly opposed or tended to oppose the notion.
The urge to sever ties with Washington cuts across party lines and regions, though Republicans and residents of rural Western states are generally warmer to the idea than Democrats and Northeasterners, according to the poll.
Anger with President Barack Obama’s handling of issues ranging from healthcare reform to the rise of Islamic State militants drives some of the feeling, with Republican respondents citing dissatisfaction with his administration as coloring their thinking.
But others said long-running Washington gridlock had prompted them to wonder if their states would be better off striking out on their own, a move no U.S. state has tried in the 150 years since the bloody Civil War that led to the end of slavery in the South.
(For the rest of the article, click the link.)
Continue Reading on http://www.reuters.com

Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/09/20/secession-longer-nutty-idea/#uo9sdSE9I0ahVfaH.99


A Beggar in Silk Robes

Once again the Muslim president of the United States went hat in hand on the world stage to embarrass America. He spoke of America’s idealism as the land of freedom, opportunity and moral aptitude as though he didn’t pledge to transform this country fundamentally. His speech would suggest that his six year assault on the Constitution and our Bill of Rights bolstered our readiness, economy and public image.

Barack apologized for our shortcomings and lectured world leaders on their responsibility to support our initiatives. It is we, the American people who should apologize to the world for electing this menace and foisting him on the world stage to deny our failure to lead with moral fortitude. We can no longer lead because we are caught in the web of Islamic ambitious ideology and have sided with the terrorists by choice or ignorance. Europe has taken note.

Anything man builds must start with a solid foundation. We crow about a coalition of Muslim countries to support our warlike decision to retaliate for injustices and atrocities committed against Americans and others in the Middle East. We eschew the word war as if it is unacceptable in polite company. On that terribly flawed foundation we ask for members of the United Nations to join this coalition, and no doubt some will; half hearted at best, regardless of rhetoric to the contrary. Most world leaders know better than to trust Muslims to make war on Muslims for the benefit of infidels. It is a war against Christians and Jews not democracy.

An American led coalition against radical Islamic forces, if an American president were to lead the initiative, would consist of every European country, Israel and other staunch allies to devise a plan to prevent ISIS and all radical Muslim proselytizers from following through. World opinion is not enough to deter terrorists but world opinion backed by unified, immediate retaliatory action, kept these predators in their cages for hundreds of years. It is clear and historically demonstrated that these Neanderthals fear and respect superior power.

Barack Hussein Obama: You can’t have it both ways; at least not for very long. You can tell us and the world a million times that we will not make war against Islam. We know the difference between Islam and radical Islam and your words blur that distinction intentionally. That does not equate to moral equivalency. We are at war against an ideology that only Muslims accept. They have declared war on us and the rest of civilization. By blurring the difference you have avoided going after terrorists with the full might of this great nation and provided terrorist organizations with military and political influence and strength they have never before enjoyed. The charade must end.


Guido Volante, Author “Treason Among Us: Secrets of the S.E.C.”